Tell me more
This site uses "cookies" to help us evaluate our site and provide a richer experience. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.

Cookies are small files which a website places on your computer. Each time you visit the website in the future your browser will send those files back to the website.

This website uses cookies to see how our visitors move around our site, which helps us to improve it.

Cookies are also used to provide connections to Facebook, and add YouTube videos to the site. Those cookies are sent to those services, not to our website. If you're a user of Facebook or Youtube those sites could be aware of your visit to some pages on this site. If you would prefer that they not track this you can switch on "Do Not Track" functions in some new browsers, and some anti-virus software.


Gov't loses last-ditch appeal on FITs

After weeks of legal wrangling, the Supreme Court has thrown out the government's appeal against an earlier ruling that its 12 December deadline for changes to the Feed-in Tariff for solar PV was illegal. This means that people who had solar panels installed between 12 December 2011 and 3 March 2012 will now receive the higher rate tariff of 43.3 pence per kilowatt hour for the full 25-year term of the tariff, instead of the 21p rate being introduced on 1 April 2012. No further appeals are now possible.

FOE wins legal challenge

Thumbs-up from FOE's Executive Director, Andy Atkins, at the Supreme Court's ruling upholding the legal challenge to the 12 December FITs deadline

The legal challenge was originally brought by Friends of the Earth (FOE) and two solar PV companies (see Legal tussle leaves FITs in a tangle). FOE's Executive Director, Andy Atkins, described the ruling as a landmark decision, and said that "the government must now get on with the urgent task of restoring confidence in UK solar power".

Energy Secretary Ed Davey responded by saying "We are disappointed by the decision of the Supreme Court...but the Court's decision draws a line under the case."